Andrew Paulson vs Jonas Trinker Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Paulson vs J. Trinker

Andrew Paulson
CZE
l
l
l
l
w
w
w
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
24
Age
30
6'4" (193 cm)
Height
-
635
C. Rank
861
302
Best Rank
755
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Jonas Trinker
AUT
w
l
w
l
l
w
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
24
Age
30
6'4" (193 cm)
Height
-
635
C. Rank
861
302
Best Rank
755
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Paulson 1 - 0 Trinker
They have played 2 sets in total, with Andrew Paulson winning 2 and Jonas Trinker winning 0. The last match between Andrew Paulson and Jonas Trinker was at the M15 Liberec, 22-10-2019, Round: R1, Surface: Carpet, with Andrew Paulson getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Paulson | 1 |
| Trinker | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Liberec(10-22-19)
Andrew Paulson
6
6
Jonas Trinker
4
4
A. Paulson vs J. Trinker H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 61.35% (173-109) | Career Total W/L | 52.05% (216-199) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 7 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Paulson vs J. Trinker Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Andrew Paulson has won 44.58% of points on their second serve, while Jonas Trinker has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Andrew Paulson, in recent form, has won 45.33% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jonas Trinker has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.21% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Andrew Paulson has saved 59.34% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jonas Trinker has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Andrew Paulson has won 31.25% of matches played (W/L 5/11), with Jonas Trinker winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Andrew Paulson has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 26/14), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 97/65). Jonas Trinker has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 63/50), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 130/129).
- Player level: In the last year, Andrew Paulson has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 35.71% of matches (W/L 5/9), where as Jonas Trinker has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Andrew Paulson winning 1 times and Jonas Trinker being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Andrew Paulson winning 2 and Jonas Trinker winning 0.
- The last match between Andrew Paulson and Jonas Trinker was at the M15 Liberec, 22-10-2019, Round: R1, Surface: Carpet, with Andrew Paulson getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:8:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Andrew Paulson has played against opponents with an average rank of 280.31 while Jonas Trinker has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Andrew Paulson has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jonas Trinker has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Andrew Paulson has converted 23.91% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jonas Trinker has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Andrew Paulson vs Jonas Trinker Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Paulson vs J. Trinker H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 8 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:8:0 | Average Match Time | 1:8:0 |
| 63% (30/48) | 1st Serve % | 62% (37/60) |
| 87% (26/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (28/37) |
| 83% (15/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (10/23) |
| 40% (2/5) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
| 37% (22/60) | Return Points Win % | 15% (7/48) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Paulson 46%, Trinker 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Paulson 46%, Trinker 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Paulson 59%, Trinker 0%.
A. Paulson Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 7-6(8) 2-1 ret. | ||
F | L | 7-5 6-1 | ||
SF | W | 5-7 6-3 6-3 | ||
QF | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 7-5 3-6 7-6(5) | ||
J. Trinker Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 4-6 6-3 6-1 | ||
R2 | W | 6-1 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 7-5 3-6 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(5) 4-6 6-4 | ||

A. Paulson vs J. Trinker Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.35% (173/109) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.05% (216/199) |
| 59.35% (381/261) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.17% (492/451) |
| 53.33% (3223/2820) | Games Win/Loss | 50.81% (4553/4407) |
| 65.00% (26/14) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.75% (63/50) |
| 59.88% (97/65) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.19% (130/129) |
| 62.50% (50/30) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53.49% (23/20) |
| 0.37 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1099 | Aces Total | 836 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 795 | Total Double Faults | 647 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 492.39 | Average Opponent Rank | 365.56 |
| 60% (10641/17783) | 1st Serve % | 61% (8155/13420) |
| 71% (7512/10641) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (5431/8155) |
| 51% (3634/7142) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (2317/5264) |
| 41% (779/1893) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (556/1272) |
| 40% (7243/18163) | Return Points Win % | 40% (5215/13045) |
| 47.22% (51/57) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 70.11% (122/52) | Futures W/L | 52.17% (216/198) |
| 62% (171/276) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (215/414) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (42/76) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (59/101) |
| 57% (47/82) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (53/114) |
| 89% (172/153) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (228/192) |
| 11% (172/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (228/36) |
| 19% (110/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (187/24) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Sun, 30 Nov, 07:15 AM
PredictionSun, 30 Nov, 02:00 PM
PredictionSun, 30 Nov, 11:00 AM
PredictionSun, 30 Nov, 05:00 AM
PredictionSun, 30 Nov, 10:00 AM
PredictionSun, 30 Nov, 10:30 AM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

29 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

29 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →James Duckworth vs Dane Sweeny Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Argentina Open – Buenos Aires Preview And Prediction: Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Betting Tips & Picks November 28, 2025
Top Predictions Today
23:10
H2H 0-0
05:30
H2H 0-0
14:00
H2H 0-0
15:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Athens Challenger
Greece
Bogota Challenger
Colombia
Islamabad Challenger
Pakistan
Maia Challenger
Portugal
Manama 2 Challenger
Bahrain
Playford Challenger
Australia
Temuco Challenger
Chile
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Gwalior
India
M15 Phan Thiet
Vietnam
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Bhopal
India
M25 Heraklion
Greece